This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia—A Review observed (11 % rate of new permanent neurological deficits).43 Park et al.


explored the role of GKRS as a minimally invasive alternative in TN caused by VBE.2


In this study of 20 patients, only 30 % achieved BNI


score I pain control, while 75 % achieved BNI scores I–IIIb pain control. Sixty per cent had pain recurrence, while 10 % developed facial sensory dysfunction. Long-term pain control (BNI scores I–IIIb) rates were 53, 20, and 10 % at one, three, and five years, respectively. These results are not as good as those for patients without VBE but, due to the minimal rate of complications, GKRS should be considered as a reasonable option for these patients.


TN often recurs regardless of treatment approach. At least one-quarter of patients have pain recurrence after an initial MVD.4


We have observed


Thus, patients often require multimodality therapy and repeat procedures, even repeat GKRS. Park et al. evaluated the validity of a repeat GKRS strategy after previous failed GKRS treatment for TN in 119 patients.2


a recurrence rate of one-quarter to one-third in patients treated by glycerol rhizotomy44 by GKRS.21


and approximately 40 % in patients treated In this cohort, 54 % of patients had undergone previous surgical


procedures in addition to their first GKRS procedure. Following repeat GKRS, 32 % achieved complete pain relief (BNI score I) and 87 % achieved BNI scores I–IIIb pain control after a median latency of 1.5 months. Although 34 % of patients had pain recurrence, long-term pain control (BNI scores I–IIIb) was achieved in 88, 70, and 44 % of patients after one, three, and five years, respectively. Twenty-one per cent of patients developed new or worsened facial sensory dysfunction, a rate twice the


1. Burchiel K, A new classification for facial pain, Neurosurgery, 2003;53:1164–7.


2. Park KJ, Kondziolka D, Kano H, et al., Outcomes of gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia secondary to vertebrobasilar ectasia, J Neurosurg, 2012;116:73–81..


3. Jannetta PJ, Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia, J Neurosurg, 1967;26(Suppl.):159–62.


4. Barker FG II, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, et al., The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia, N Engl J Med, 1996;334:1077–83.


5. Hilton DA, Love S, Gradidge T, Coakham HB, Pathological findings associated with trigeminal neuralgia caused by vascular compression, Neurosurgery, 1994;35:299–303.


6. Brisman R, Trigeminal neuralgia and multiple sclerosis, Arch Neurol, 1987;44:379–81.


7. Iragui VJ, Wiederholt WC, Romine JS, Evoked potentials in trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis, Arch Neurol, 1986;43:444–6.


8. Taylor JC, Brauer S, Espir ML, Long-term treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with carbamazepine, Postgrad Med J, 1981;57:16–8.


9. Katusic S, Beard CM, Bergstralh E, Kurland LT, Incidence and clinical features of trigeminal neuralgia, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945-1984, Ann Neurol, 1990;27:89–95.


10. Cole CD, Liu JK, Apfelbaum RI, Historical perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, Neurosurg Focus, 2005;18:E4.


11. Dandy WE, The brain. In: Walters W, Ellis FH Jr (eds), Lewis-Walters’ Practice of Surgery, Volume 12, Hagerstown, MD: WF Prior, 1963;1–671.


12. Oh IH, Choi SK, Park BJ, et al., The treatment outcome of elderly patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: micro-vascular decompression versus gamma knife radiosurgery, J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2008;44:199–204.


13. Harris W, An analysis of 1,433 cases of paroxysmal trigeminal neuralgia (trigeminal-tic) and the end-results of gasserian alcohol injection, Brain, 1940;63:209–24.


14. Häkanson S, Trigeminal neuralgia treated by the injection of glycerol into the trigeminal cistern, Neurosurgery, 1981;9:638–46.


15. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: technique and expectations, Neurosurg Focus, 2005;18:E7.


16. Jho HD, Lunsford LD, Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy. Current technique and results, Neurosurg Clin N Am, 1997;8:63–74. 17. Kanpolat Y, Savas A, Bekar A, Berk C, Percutaneous controlled


original procedure. Patients who had good relief from the initial GKRS procedure and those with some degree of facial sensory dysfunction had improved outcomes after repeat GKRS. These results suggest that repeat GKRS is a useful treatment modality, but is associated with an increased risk of facial sensory dysfunction.


Conclusions


TN is a debilitating condition for its sufferers and its management is, at times, not straightforward. Many patients will fail medical management and request some sort of surgical intervention. The vascular compression theory is well accepted and MVD has proven the most efficacious and longest lasting of the surgical options, but it is the most invasive and involves the greatest intrinsic risks. When patients are willing to accept these risks and can tolerate surgery, we recommend MVD. Percutaneous procedures involve less risk than open posterior fossa surgery and they offer relief in a similar immediate fashion, but are less efficacious and can result in a meaningful degree of facial sensory dysfunction. We offer percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy to patients with severe pain, where the latency of GKRS is unacceptable. GKRS is a first-line treatment for TN in patients unwilling or unable to tolerate open procedures or when open procedures have no role (i.e. MVD for MS-related TN). It offers patients an opportunity for meaningful long-lasting pain relief with virtually none of the risks of open surgery and it can be repeated with similar effectiveness. Figure 2 depicts our typical treatment algorithm for TN. Low-risk pain relief and preservation of trigeminal sensation are both appropriate goals for the management of TN. n


radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients, Neurosurgery, 2001;48:524–34.


18. Lunsford LD, Flickinger J, Lindner G, Maitz A, Stereotactic radiosurgery of the brain using the first United States 201 cobalt-60 source Gamma Knife, Neurosurgery, 1989;24:151–9.


19. Leksell L, Sterotaxic radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia, Acta Chir Scand, 1971;137:311–4.


20. Kondziolka D, Lacomis D, Niranjan A, et al., Histological effects of trigeminal nerve radiosurgery in a primate model: implications for trigeminal neuralgia recovery, Neurosurgery, 2000;46:971–7.


21. Kondziolka D, Zorro O, Lobato-Polo J, et al., Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, J Neurosurg, 2010;112:758–65.


22. Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, et al., Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of the Barrow Neurological Institute, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000;47:1013–9.


23. Pollock BE, Phuong LK, Gorman DA, et al., Stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, J Neurosurg, 2002;97:347–53.


24. Sheehan J, Pan H, Stroila M, Steiner L, Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: outcomes and prognostic factors, J Neurosurg, 2005;102;434–41.


25. Régis J, Arkha Y, Yomo S, et al., [Radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia: long-term results and influence of operative nuances], Neurochirurgie, 2009;55:213–22.


26. Pollock BE, Phuong LK, Foote RL, et al., High-dose trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery associated with increased risk of trigeminal nerve dysfunction, Neurosurgery, 2001;49:58–62; discussion 62–4.


27. Flickinger JC, Pollock BE, Kondziolka D, et al., Does increased nerve length within the treatment volume improve trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery? A prospective double blind, randomized study, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001;51:449–54.


28. Massager N, Lorenzoni J, Devriendt D, et al., Gamma Knife surgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia using a far-anterior cisternal target and a high dose of radiation, J Neurosurg, 2004;100:597–605.


29. Régis J, Metellus P, Hayashi M, et al., Prospective controlled trial of Gamma Knife surgery for essential trigeminal neuralgia, J Neurosurg, 2006;104:913–24.


30. Matsuda S, Serizawa T, Nagano O, Ono J, Comparison of the results of 2 targeting methods in Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia, J Neurosurg, 2008;109(Suppl.):185–9.


31. Brisman R, Microvascular decompression vs. Gamma Knife for typical trigeminal neuralgia: preliminary findings, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2007;85:94–8.


32. Linskey ME, Ratanatharathorn V, Penagarciano J, A prospective cohort study of microvascular decompression and Gamma Knife surgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia, J Neurosurg, 2008;109(Suppl.):160–72.


33. Pollock BE, Schoeberl KA, Prospective comparison of posterior fossa exploration and stereotactic radiosurgery dorsal root entry zone target as a primary surgery for patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, Neurosurgery, 2010;67:633–9.


34. Tronnier VM, Rasche D, Hamer J, et al., Treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of long-term outcomes after radiofrequency rhizotomy and microvascular decompression, Neurosurgery, 2001;48:1261–7; discussion 1267–8.


35. Tatli M, Satici O, Kanpolat Y, Sindou M, Various surgical modalities for trigeminal neuralgia: literature study of respective long-term outcomes, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2008;150:243–55.


36. Henson CF, Goldman HW, Rosenwasser RH, et al., Glycerol rhizotomy versus gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: an analysis of patients treated at one institution, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005;63:82–90.


37. Resnick DK, Jannetta PJ, Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis, Surg Neurol, 1996;46:358–61.


38. Broggi G, Ferroli P, Franzini A, et al., Operative findings and outcomes of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in 35 patients affected by multiple sclerosis, Neurosurgery, 2004;55:830–8.


39. Zorro O, Lobato-Polo J, Kano H, et al., Gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia, Neurology, 2009;73:1149–54.


40. Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Ponce FA, et al., Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis, J Neurosurg, 2002;97(5 Suppl.):529–32.


41. Huang E, Teh BS, Zeck O, et al., Gamma knife radiosurgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis patients, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2002;79:44–50.


42. Lopez BC, Hamlyn PJ, Zakrzewska JM, Systematic review of ablative neurosurgical techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, Neurosurgery, 2004;54:973–83.


43. Miyazaki S, Fukushima T, Tamagawa T, Morita A, [Trigeminal neuralgia due to compression of the trigeminal root by a basilar artery trunk. Report of 45 cases], Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 1987;27:742–8.


44. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Long-term results after glycerol rhizotomy for multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia, Can J Neurol Sci, 1994;21:137–40.


US NEUROLOGY


153


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108