Neurofibromatosis Neurosurgical Treatment and Follow-up

Neurofibromatosis Neurosurgical Treatment and Follow-up

European Neurological Disease 2007 - Issue II
Published: October 2008
dots

Neurofibromatosis Type I
Neurofibromatosis type I (NFI), also known as von Recklinghausen disease, is one of the most common inherited diseases in humans. Its incidence is one per 3,500–4,000 live births and it affects both sexes equally. NFI is an autosomal-dominant disorder and is the result of a mutation of a gene mapped to chromosome 17, which is the NFI gene.1,2 The product of the gene is a protein called neurofibromin, a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that helps to maintain the protooncogene Ras in an inactive form. NFI is characterised by 100% penetrance but varying expressivity.

The diagnostic criteria for NFI have been formulated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference on NF,3 and include six or more café-au-lait macules (CALM), two or more neurofibromas of any type or one or more pleximorm neurofibroma, two or more Lisch nodules, distinct osseous lesions and a first-degree relative with NFI. If two or more of these signs are present, the diagnosis is NFI. Although direct sequencing could be used to detect the causative mutation for individuals who meet these diagnostic criteria for NFI, molecular testing is generally not necessary.

Patients with NFI manifest clinically with cutaneous, ophthalmological, musculoskeletal and/or neurological symptoms.4,5 The cutaneous and ocular manifestations are the most common and typically are CALM, axillary freckling and Lisch nodules. CALM are apparent in 99% of patients and are usually present at birth. Musculoskeletal abnormalities include bone abnormalities, such as skeletal dysplasia (particularly sphenoid wing dysplasia), scoliosis and tibial pseudarthrosis. The neurological manifestations of NFI are variable and may be due to brain, spine or peripheral nerve tumours, epilepsy, macrocephaly, hydrocephalus, meningoceles and/or peripheral neuropathy.

Neurofibromas in NFI manifest as cutaneous neurofibromas, subcutaneous neurofibromas, nodular plexiform neurofibromas and diffuse plexiform neurofibromas.6 In contrast with cutaneous neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas may undergo malignant transformation. Both NFI and NFII patients are at increased risk of developing intra-cranial tumours; however, the tumour types are quite different. Brain tumours that have a higher incidence in NFI patients than in the general population are gliomas, ependymosmas, meningiomas and primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNETs). Gliomas are typically lowgrade and involve the optic pathways, hypothalamus, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord.

Optic pathway tumours usually involve the anterior visual pathways and occur in 11–19% of patients. Almost half are asymptomatic at diagnosis, while in the others the symptoms are related to the location of the tumours along the optic pathways. The initial management of optic pathway gliomas is follow-up with serial neuroimaging and ophthalmological examinations. These tumours may have a more indolent natural history and are less aggressive than optic gliomas in patients without NFI.4,5,7 Tumours involving the intra-orbital segment of the optic nerve cause progressive proptosis, papilledema and optic atrophy. Those involving the chiasm may extend to the hypothalamus and third ventricle and lead to severe endocrine disturbances and/or hydrocephalus. In cases of significant proptosis or visual loss, and particularly for unilateral tumours located anterior to the optic chiasm, surgical removal is an option. Residual tumour or regrowth after incomplete removal may be treated with chemotherapy (in children <5 years) or radiotherapy.

NFI patients may present with vascular complications. Strokes occur in approximately 1% of patients and the most common cause is the occlusion of the carotid or middle cerebral artery.1 NFI has a significant effect on learning and cognition. Areas of signal hyperintensity on transverse relaxation (T2)-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) – the ‘unidentified bright objects’ – are observed in 60–70% of children with NFI, but the relationship between unidentified bright objects and cognitive dysfunction remains controversial. Psychiatric disorders occur in 33% of patients, which is a much higher frequency compared with the general population.

References:
  1. Lee MJ, Stephenson DA, Recent developments in neurofibromatosis type 1, Curr Opin Neurol, 2007;20:135 41.
  2. Ward BA, Gutmann DH, Neurofibromatosis 1: from lab bench to clinic, Pediatr Neurol, 2005;32:221 8.
  3. Neurofibromatosis, Conference Statement, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, Arch Neurol, 1988; 45:575 8.
  4. Al-Otibi M, Rutka JT, Neurosurgical implications of neurofibromatosis Type I in children, Neurosurg Focus, 2006;20(1):E2.
  5. Yohay K, Neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, Neurologist, 2006; 12:8693.
  6. Leonard JR, Ferner RE, Thomas N, Gutmann DH, Cervical cord compression from plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2007;78(12):1404 6.
  7. Thiagalingam S, Flaherty M, Billson F, et al., Neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway gliomas: follow-up of 54 patients, Ophthalmology, 2004;111:568 77.
  8. Packer RJ, Gutmann DH, Rubenstein A, et al., Plexiform neurofibromas in NF1: Toward biologic based therapy, Neurology, 2002;58:1461 70.
  9. Neff BA, Welling DB: Current concepts in the evaluation and treatment of neurofibromatosis type II. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2005;38:671 84.
  10. Samii M, Matthies C, Tatagiba M, Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2, Neurosurgery, 1997;40: 696 706.
  11. Baser ME, Gareth DR, Evans DG, Gutmann DH, Neurofibromatosis 2, Curr Opin Neurol, 2003;16:27 33.
  12. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: Statement on Acoustic Neuroma, Arch Neurol, 1994;51:201 7.
  13. Meng JJ, Lowrie DJ, Sun H, et al., Interaction between two isoforms of the NF2 tumor suppressor protein, merlin, and between merlin and ezrin, suggests modulation of ERM proteins by merlin, J Neurosci Res, 2000;62:491 502.
  14. Bradley WD, Clinical manifestations of mutations in the neurofibromatosis Type 2 gene in vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas), Laryngoscope, 1998;108:178 89.
  15. Evans DG, Baser ME, O`Reilly B, et al., Management of the patient and family with neurofibromatosis 2: a consensus conference statement, Br J Neurosur, 2005;19:5 12.
  16. Brackmann DE, Fayad JN, Slattery WH III, et al., Early proactive management of vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2, Neurosurg, 2001;49:274 80.
  17. Slattery WH III, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger W, Hearing preservation in neurofibromatosis type 2, Am J Otol, 1998;18: 638 43.
  18. Mathieu D, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al., Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: an analysis of tumor control, complications, and hearing preservation rates, Neurosurgery, 2007;60:460 68.
  19. Lenarz T, Moshrefi M, Matthies C, et al., Auditory brainstem implant: part I. Auditory performance and its evolution over time, Otol Neurotol, 2001;22:823 33.
  20. Lim H, Lenarz T, Joseph G, et al., Electrical stimulation of the midbrain for hearing restoration: Insight into the functional organization of the human central auditory system, J Neurosci, 2007;27(49):13541 51.

Copyright® 2004 - 2010 Business Briefings, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Touch Neurology is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatement recommendations.