Evidence for the Use of Levodopa–Carbidopa–Entacapone (STALEVO) to Improve Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence for the Use of Levodopa–Carbidopa–Entacapone (STALEVO) to Improve Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease

Published: European Neurology - Volume 3 Issue 2
dots

Levodopa is the logical treatment in Parkinson’s disease (PD) as it replaces dopamine that is lost due to the neurodegenerative nature of the disease. It could be considered a natural agonist and remains the most effective dopaminergic replacement therapy. However, in many patients the efficacy of long-term conventional levodopa therapy is hampered by its association with the progressive development of motor fluctuations.1 Initially, PD symptoms reoccur after prolonged levodopa intake due to progressive shortening of the drug effect duration (the so-called ‘wearing-off’ phenomenon), resulting in the reappearance of disabling PD symptoms, as well as dyskinesia. Motor fluctuations can become more difficult to manage with late (delayed- ‘on’ phenomenon) or even the absence (no-’on’ phenomenon) of beneficial effects of levodopa intake. Problematic motor fluctuations can also result from a rapid and sudden reoccurrence of PD symptoms during a successful ‘on’ that is induced by a single dose of levodopa (‘on–off’ phenomenon).

The classic consensus is that about 50% of patients develop motor fluctuations after five years of levodopa treatment.2 However, recent studies have suggested that the frequency is even higher. In the Deprenyl and Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease (DATATOP) study, 20% of the patients developed motor fluctuations after six months of conventional levodopa treatment and 50% suffered from complications after 18 months.3 Due to the disability caused by the reappearance of motor PD symptoms, motor fluctuations create a real burden for patients and have a negative impact on their quality of life;4 accordingly, there is a real need for physicians to take on the challenge of correcting motor fluctuations for the benefit of their patients. Moreover, evidence also suggests that a non-optimised dopamine replacement strategy, reflected by the presence of motor fluctuations, could be responsible for a deleterious brain plasticity that, with time, could reinforce the fluctuations and contribute to the development of dyskinesia, another complication induced by conventional levodopa therapy.5

For decades, levodopa has been co-administered with a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) – carbidopa or benserazide – which prevents levodopa from being metabolised into dopamine before entering the brain. Peripheral dopamine does not cross the blood–brain barrier and, moreover, is responsible for side effects such as hypotension and nausea. More recently, the fixed combination levodopa–carbidopa–entacapone (STALEVO), a new formulation that combines levodopa, carbidopa and entacapone, an inhibitor of catechol- O-methyl transferase (COMT), has been approved for the treatment of adult patients with PD and end-of-dose motor fluctuations not stabilised on levodopa/DDCI treatment. The enzyme COMT catabolises peripheral levodopa to 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) (see Figure 1A); thus, the addition of entacapone to the formulation increases the availability of levodopa in the plasma (see Figure 1B).

References:
  1. Marsden CD, Parkes JD, Success and problems of long-term levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease, Lancet, 1977;1(8007): 345–9.
  2. Ahlskog JE, Muenter MD, Frequency of levodopa-related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature, Mov Disord, 2001;16:448–58.
  3. Parkinson Study Group, Impact of deprenyl and tocopherol treatment on Parkinson’s disease in DATATOP patients requiring levodopa, Ann Neurol, 1996;39:37–45.
  4. Chapuis S, Ouchchane L, Metz O, et al., Impact of the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease on the quality of life, Mov Disord, 2005;20:224–30.
  5. Olanow CW, Obeso JA, Stocchi F, Drug insight: Continuous dopaminergic stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, Nat Clin Pract Neurol, 2006;2:382–92.
  6. Müller T, Erdmann C, Muhlack S, et al., Pharmacokinetic behaviour of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa after repeat administration of evodopa/carbidopa with and without entacapone in patients with Parkinson’s disease, J Neural Transm, 2006;113:1441–8.
  7. Parkinson Study Group, Entacapone improves motor fluctuations in levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease patients, Ann Neurol, 1997;42:747–55.
  8. Rinne UK, Larsen JP, Siden A, Worm-Petersen J, Entacapone enhances the response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations. Nomecomt Study Group, Neurology, 1998;5:1309–14.
  9. Poewe WH, Deuschl G, Gordin A, et al., Celomen Study Group, Efficacy and safety of entacapone in Parkinson’s disease patients with suboptimal levodopa response: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study in Germany and Austria (Celomen study), Acta Neurol Scand, 2002;105: 245–55.
  10. Brooks DJ, Sagar H; UK-Irish Entacapone Study Group, Entacapone is beneficial in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, six month study, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2003;74:1071–9.
  11. Brooks DJ, Leinonen M, Kuoppamäki M, Nissinen H, Five-year efficacy and safety of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone in patients with Parkinson’s disease, J Neural Transm, 2008;115: 843–9.
  12. Haapaniemi H, Reinikainen K, Leinonen M, Karonen T, Tolerability and safety of entacapone in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2001;7 (Suppl. 1):S57, abstract P-TU-190.
  13. Myllyla VV, Kultalahti ER, Haapaniemi H, Leinonen M; FILOMEN Study Group, Twelve-month safety of entacapone in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Eur J Neurol, 2001;8:53–60.
  14. Horstink M, Tolosa E, Bonuccelli U, et al., European Federation of Neurological Societies; Movement Disorder Society— European Section, Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson’s disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section (MDS-ES). Part II: late (complicated) Parkinson’s disease, Eur J Neurol, 2006;13(11):1186–1202.
  15. Pahwa R, Factor SA, Lyons KE, et al., Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice Parameter: treatment of Parkinson disease with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, Neurology, 2006;66:983–95.
  16. Hutton JT, Dippel RL, Bianchine JR, et al., Controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in the treatment of Parkinsonism, Clin Neuropharmacol, 1984;7:135–9.
  17. Poewe WH, Lees AJ, Stern GM, Treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease with an oral sustained-release preparation of L-dopa: clinical and pharmacokinetic observations, Clin Neuropharmacol, 1986;9:430–39.
  18. Hutton JT, Morris JL, Román GC, et al., Treatment of chronic Parkinson’s disease with controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa, Arch Neurol, 1988;45:861–4.
  19. Pahwa R, Busenbark K, Huber SJ, et al., Clinical experience with controlled-release carbidopa/levodopa in Parkinson’s disease, Neurology, 1993;43:677–81.
  20. Olanow CW, Fahn S, Muenter M, et al., A multicenter doubleblind placebo-controlled trial of pergolide as an adjunct to Sinemet in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 1994;9:40–47.
  21. Lieberman A, Ranhosky A, Korts D, Clinical evaluation of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson’s disease: results of a double-blind, placebocontrolled, parallel-group study, Neurology, 1997;49:162–8.
  22. Guttman M, Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson’s disease. International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group, Neurology, 1997;49:1060–65.
  23. Rascol O, Lees AJ, Senard JM, et al., Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Clin Neuropharmacol, 1996;19:234–45.
  24. Lieberman A, Olanow CW, Sethi K, et al., A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Ropinirole Study Group, Neurology, 1998;51:1057–62.
  25. Poewe W, Psychosis in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 2003;18(Suppl. 6):S80–87.
  26. Gjerstad MD, Alves G, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al., Excessive daytime sleepiness in Parkinson disease: is it the drugs or the disease?, Neurology, 2006;67:853–8.
  27. Voon V, Potenza MN, Thomsen T, Medication-related impulse control and repetitive behaviors in Parkinson’s disease, Curr Opin Neurol, 2007;20:484–92.
  28. Antonini A, Poewe W, Fibrotic heart-valve reactions to dopamine-agonist treatment in Parkinson’s disease, Lancet Neurol, 2007;6:826–9.
  29. Golbe LI, Lieberman AN, Muenter MD, et al., Deprenyl in the treatment of symptom fluctuations in advanced Parkinson’s disease, Clin Neuropharmacol, 1988;11:45–55.
  30. Parkinson Study Group, A randomized placebo-controlled trial of rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson disease and motor fluctuations: the PRESTO study, Arch Neurol, 2005;62:241–8.
  31. Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Melamed E, et al., Rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations (LARGO, Lasting effect in Adjunct therapy with Rasagiline Given Once daily, study): a randomised, doubleblind, parallel-group trial, Lancet, 2005;365:947–54.
  32. Waters CH, Sethi KD, Hauser RA, et al., Zydis selegiline reduces off time in Parkinson’s disease patients with motor fluctuations: a 3-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study, Mov Disord, 2004;19:426–32.
  33. Witjas T, Kaphan E, Azulay JP, et al., Nonmotor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: frequent and disabling, Neurology, 2002;59:408–13.
  34. Hauser RA, Deckers F, Lehert P, Parkinson’s disease home diary: further validation and implications for clinical trials, Mov Disord, 2004;19:1409–13.
  35. Damier P, Jaillon C, Clavier I, et al., Dyskinesias assessment in Phase II studies, Mov Disord, 1999;14(Suppl. 1):54–9.

Copyright® 2012 Touch Group PLC. All rights reserved.
Touch Neurology is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatment recommendations.