Emerging Treatments in Headache

Emerging Treatments in Headache

Published: BTG - FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN NEUROLOGY
dots

Migraine is a common and disabling disease, with a one-year prevalence of 12% in Western countries such as the US.1 It is associated with significant societal costs in terms of pain, bedridden days, and lost days of work. Although the development and availability of triptans over the past 17 years has revolutionized the acute treatment of migraine, many patients report an incomplete or delayed response, while others experience intolerable adverse events.2,3 Furthermore, triptans are contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease because of their vasoconstrictive activity. Therefore, other options are needed for those who do not respond optimally to triptans, as well as for those with possible drug–drug interactions, contraindications, or risk factors. Additional goals for medications in development include rapid onset of action, bypassing the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, sustained treatment response, and solid safety and tolerability profiles. In this overview of emerging treatments in headache, the current understanding of migraine pathophysiology will be outlined and medical and surgical therapies at various stages of development will be discussed. Advances in headache diagnosis and classification will also be discussed in detail.

Migraine Pathophysiology
In recent years, significant advances have been made in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology. Although the exact etiology remains to be defined, the currently prevailing theories are based on a hyperexcitable ‘trigeminovascular complex,’ and possibly cortex, in patients who are genetically predisposed to migraine. In these susceptible individuals, the trigeminovascular neurons release neurotransmitters, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P, when headache triggers are encountered. This leads to vasodilation, mast cell degranulation, increased vascular permeability, and blood vessel edema, resulting in meningeal neurogenic inflammation. This nociceptive information is transmitted from the periphery along the trigeminal nerve to the brainstem trigeminal nucleus caudalis, and then to the thalamic nuclei and the cortex, where migraine pain is ultimately perceived.4 The locus coeruleus, which contains noradrenergic neurons, the dorsal raphe nuclei, which consist of serotoninergic neurons, and the periaqueductal gray also play modulatory roles in the transmission of pain.5

The aura of migraine can be explained by the phenomenon of ‘cortical spreading depression’ (CSD). In experimental animals and in human neocortical and hippocampal tissue in vitro, CSD occurs when an electric or chemical stimulus is applied to the cerebral cortex, resulting in an excitation followed by a prolonged depolarization of cortical neurons that gradually spreads across the cortex. This wave of depolarization occurs in conjunction with a wave of oligemia.6–10 Activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subtype is required to trigger CSD in the rat cerebral cortex11 and in human neocortical tissues.12 A similar phenomenon is hypothesized to occur spontaneously in humans, producing the aura. Recent evidence obtained from functional magnetic resonance imaging,13 epidural electrophysiological recordings,14–16 and intracortical multiparametric electrodes17 have supported this hypothesis. The mechanism by which the headache phase develops from the aura is unknown and somewhat controversial, but it may be related to the cortical release of CGRP, nitric oxide, arachidonic acid, or various ions and their effects via the trigeminal nerve into the brainstem and back to the dural blood vessels.18,19

The rationale of the emerging therapies is based on the understanding of the above pathophysiology, with various treatments targeting different components of the operative pathways discussed above.

References:
  1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, et al., Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United Sates: date from the American Headache Study II, Headache, 2001;41:646–57.
  2. Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Oral triptans (serotonin 5HT 1B/1D agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a meta-analysis of 53 trials, Lancet, 2001;358:1668–75.
  3. Dodick DW, Triptan nonresponder studies: implications for clinical practice, Headache, 2005;45:156–62.
  4. Moskowitz MA, The neurobiology of vascular head pain, Ann Neurol, 1984;16:157–68.
  5. Martin VT, Behbehani MM, Toward a rational understanding of migraine trigger factors, Med Clin North Am, 2001;85:911–41.
  6. Leao AAP, Spreading depression of activity in cerebral cortex, J Neurophysiol, 1944;7:359–90.
  7. Lauritzen M, Pathophysiology of the migraine aura. The spreading depression theory, Brain, 1994;117(Pt 1):199–210.
  8. Bures J, Buresova O, Drivanek J, The mechanism and applications of Leao’s spreading depression of electroencephalographic activity, New York: Academic Press, 1974.
  9. Kruger H, Heinemann U, Luhmann HJ, Effects of ionotropic glutamate receptor blockagde and 5-HT1A receptior activation on spreading depression in rat neocortical slices, Neuroreport, 1999;10:2651–6.
  10. Somjen GG, Mechanisms of spreading depression and hypoxic spreading depression-like depolarization, Physiol Rev, 2001;81: 1065–96.
  11. Gorelova NA, Koroleva VI, Amemori T, et al., Ketamine blockade of cortical spreading depression in rats, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1987;66:440–47.
  12. Gorji A, Scheller D, Straub H, et al., Spreading depression in human neocortical slices, Brain Res, 2001;906:74–83.
  13. Hadjikhani N, Sanchez Del Rio M,Wu O, et al., Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001;98:4687–92.
  14. Strong AJ, Fabricius M, Boutelle MG, et al., Spreading and synchronous depressions of cortical activity in acutely injured human brain, Stroke, 2002;33:2738–43.
  15. Strong AJ, Detecting and characterizing spreading depression in the injured human brain, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2003;23:748.
  16. Fabricius M, Fuhr S, Bhatia R, et al., Cortical spreading depression and peri-infarct depolarization in acutely injured human cerebral cortex, Brain, 2006;129:778–90.
  17. Mayevsky A, Doiron A, Manor T, et al., Cortical spreading depression recorded from the human brain using a multiparametric monitoring system, Brain Res, 2006;740:268–74.
  18. Wahl M, Schilling L, Parsons AA, et al., Involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and nitric oxide (NO) in the pial artery dilatation elicited by cortical spreading depression, Brain Res, 1994;637:204–10.
  19. Bolay H, Moskowitz MA, The emerging importance of cortical spreading depression in migraine headache, Rev Neurol, 2005;161:655–7.
  20. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R, Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache, Ann Neurol, 1990;28:183–7.
  21. Doods H, Hallermayer G,Wu D, et al., Pharmacological profile of BIBN-4096BS. The first selective small molecular CGRP antagonist, Br J Pharmacol, 2000;129:420–23.
  22. Moreno MJ, Abounader R, Hebert E, et al., Eficacy of the nonpeptide CGRP receptor antagonist BIBN-4096BS in blocking CGRP-induced dilations in human and bovine cerebral arteries: potential implications in acute migraine treatment, Neuropharmacology, 2002;42:568–76.
  23. Petersen KA, Birk S, Lassen LH, et al., The CGRP-antagonist, BIBN-4096BS, does not affect cerebral or systemic haemodynamics in healthy volunteers, Cephalalgia, 2005;25:139–47.
  24. Petersen KA, Lassen LH, Birk S,et al., BIBN-4096Bs antagonizes human alpha-calcitonin gene related peptide-induced headache and extracerebral artery dilatation, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2005;77: 202–13.
  25. Arulmani U, Schuijt MP, Heiligers JP, et al., Effects of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist BIBN4096BS on alpha-CGRP-induced regional haemodynamic changes in anaesthetised rats, Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2004;94:291–7.
  26. Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW, et al., BIBN 4096 BS Clinical Proof of Concept Study Group, Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine, N Engl J Med, 2004;350:1104–10.
  27. Edvinsson L, Clinical data on the CGRP antagonist BIBN4096BS for treatment of migraine attacks, CNS Drug Rev, 2005;11:69–76.
  28. Iovino M, Feifel U, Yong C-L, et al., Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BIBN-4096BS, the first selective small molecular calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, following single intravenous administration in health volunteers, Cephalalgia, 2004;24:645–56.
  29. Ho TW, Mannix LK, Fan X, et al.; On behalf of the MK-0974 Protocol 004 study group, Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine, Neurology, 2008;70:1304–12.
  30. Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Room KI, Lipton RB, Triptans (serotonin 5-HT 1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials, Cephalagia, 2002; 22:633–58.
  31. Lance JW, Goadsby PJ, Mechanism and Management of Headache, 7th ed., New York: Elsevier, 2005.
  32. Siegel SJ, O’Neill C, Dubé LM, et al., A unique iontophoretic patch for optimal transdermal delivery of sumatriptan, Pharm Res, 2007;24:1919–26.
  33. www.nupathe.com/pdf/16nupathe_pr_080630.pdf
  34. Cohen AS, Goadsby PJ, Functional neuroimaging of primary headache disorders, Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2004;4:105–10.
  35. Sprenger T, Boecker H, Tolle TR, et al., Specific hypothalamic activation during a spontaneous cluster headache attack, Neurology, 2004;62:516–17.
  36. May A, Bahra A, Buchel C, et al., Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks, Lancet, 1998;352:275–8.
  37. May A, Bahra A, Buchel C, et al., Functional magnetic resonance imaging in spontaneous attacks of SUNCT: short-lasting neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing, Ann Neurol, 1999;46:791–4.
  38. Leone M, Deep brain stimulation in headache, Lancet Neurol, 2006;5:873–7.
  39. Proietti Cecchini A, Mea E, Tullo V, et al., Long-term experience of neuromodulation in TACs, Neurol Sci, 2008;29(Suppl. 1):S62–4.
  40. Jasper JF, Hayek SM, Implanted occipital nerve stimulators: systematic review, Pain Physician, 2008;11:187–200.
  41. Mohammad Y, Kothari R, Hughes G, et al., Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) relieves migraine headache, Platform Presentation, 48th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society, Los Angeles, June 23, 2006.
  42. Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, et al., Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Using a Portable Device is Effective for the Acute Treatment of Migraine with Aura: Results of a DoubleBlind, Sham Controlled, Randomized Study, Research presentation, 50th Annual Scientific Meeting of American Headache Society, Boston, June 27, 2008.
  43. Kori S, Cook R,Wang M, Shewsbury S, MAP0004, an orally inhaled formulation of DHE, delivers faster and more consistent blood levels of the drug compared to traditional oral, subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intranasal formulations of DHE, Poster, presented at the American Headache Society Annual Scientific Meeting, June 26–29, 2008.
  44. Shrewsbury, SN, Kori SH, Miller SD, et al., Randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of MAP0004 (orally-inhaled DHE) in adult asthmatics, Curr Med Res Opin, 2008;24:1977–85.
  45. Cook R, Shewsbury S, Pharmacological profiling of dihydroergotamine and its relevance to systemic delivery via the respiratory tract, Poster, Presented at the American Headache Society Annual Scientific Meeting, June 26–29, 2008.
  46. www.mappharma.com/Products/InhaledMigraine.htm
  47. Kori S, Shewsbury S, Newer acute migraine specific drugs may provide improved sustained relief and freedom over 24 and 48 hours post dosing, Poster, Presented at the American Headache Society Annual Scientific Meeting, June 26–29, 2008.
  48. Friedman BW, Esses D, Solorzano C, et al., A randomized controlled trial of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for treatment of acute migraine, Ann Emerg Med, 2007 (Epub ahead of print).
  49. Coppola M, Yealy DM, Leibold RA, Randomized, placebocontrolled evaluation of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for emergency department treatment of migraine headache, Ann Emerg Med, 1995;26:541–6.
  50. Tanen DA, Miller S, French T, Riffenburgh RH, Intravenous sodium valproate versus prochlorperazine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headaches: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, Ann Emerg Med, 2003;41;847–53.
  51. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00422812?term=Headache& rank=28
  52. Cassella J, Fishman R, Spyker D, Inhaled loxapine, a dopamine antagonist, has IV-like pharmacokinetics and reduces headache pain in patients having an acute migraine attack, Poster Presentation, European Headache and Migraine Trust International Congress, London, September 4–7, 2008.
  53. Thomsen LL, Olesen J, Nitric oxide in primary headaches, Curr Opin Neurol, 2001;14:315–21.
  54. Thomsen LL, Olesen J, A pivotal role of nitric oxide in migraine pain, Ann NY Acad Sci, 1997;835:363–72.
  55. Olesen J, Thomsen LL, Lassen LH, Olesen IJ, The nitric oxide hypothesis of migraine and other vascular headaches, Cephalalgia, 1995;15:94–100.
  56. Goadsby PJ, Migraine: emerging treatment options for preventive and acute attack therapy, Expert Opin Emerg Drugs, 2006;11:419–27.
  57. Reuter U, Bolay H, Jansen-Olesen I, et al., Delayed inflammation in rat meniges: implications for migraine pathophysiology, Brain, 2001;124:2490–2502.
  58. Hoskin KL, Bulmer DCE, Goadsby PJ, Fos expression in the trigeminocervical complex of the cat after stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus is reduced by L-NAME, Neurosci Lett, 1999;266:173–6.
  59. Mosek A, Groppa S, Barkan R, The efficacy and safety of MTR- 106 in the treatment of acute migraine without aura in females: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled, dose escalating study, Poster presentation, European Headache and Migraine Trust International Congress, London, September 4–7, 2008.
  60. www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/105590.php
  61. Read SJ, Smith MI, Hunter AJ, et al., SB-220453, a potential novel antimigraine compound, inhibits nitric oxide release following induction of cortical spreading depression in the anesthetized cat, Cephalalgia, 1999;20:92–9.
  62. Smith MI, Read SJ, Chan WN, et al., Reptetitve cortical spreading depression in a gyrencephalic feline brin: inhibition by the novel benzoylamino-benzopyran SB-220453, Cephalalgia, 2000;20:546–53.
  63. Tyedskov JF, Iversen HK, Olesen J, A double-blind study of SB- 220453 (Tonerbasat) in the glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) model of migraine, Cephalalgia ,2004;24:875–82.
  64. Sang CN, Ramadan NM,Wallihan RG, et al., LY293558, a novel AMPA/GluR5 antagonist, is efficacious and well-tolerated in acute migraine, Cephalalgia, 2004;24:596–602.
  65. www.torreypinestherapeutics.com
  66. Mitsikostas DD, del Rio MS, Moskowitz MA,Waeber C, Both 5HT1B and 5HT1F receptros modulate c-fos expression within rat trigeminal nucleus caudlais, Eur J Pharmacol, 1999;369:271–7.
  67. Shepheard S, Edvinsson L, Cumberbatch M, et al., Possible antimigraine mechanisms of action of the 5-HT1F receptor agonist LY334370, Cephalalgia, 1999;19:851–8.
  68. Goldstein DJ, Roon KI, Offen WW, et al., Selective serotonin 1F (5-HT1F) receptor agonist LY334370 for acute migraine: a randomized controlled trial, Lancet, 2001;358:1230–34.
  69. Ramadan NM, Buchanan TM, New and future migraine therapy, Pharmcol Ther, 2006;112:199–212.
  70. www.colucid.com
  71. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuroalgias, and facial pain, Cephalalgia, 1988;8(Suppl. 7):1–96.
  72. Bigal ME, Tepper SJ, Sheftell FD, et al., Chronic daily headache: correlation between the 2004 and 1988 International Headache Society diagnostic criteria, Headache, 2004;44:684–91.
  73. Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Tepper SJ, et al., The classification of chronic daily headache in adolescents – a comparison between the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders and alternative diagnostic criteria, Headache, 2005;45:582–9.
  74. Solomon S, Lipton RB, Newman LC, Evaluation of chronic daily headache-comparison to criteria for chronic tension-type headache, Cephalalgia, 1992;12:365–8.
  75. Sanin LC, Mathew NT, Bellmyer LR, Ali S, The International Headache Society (IHS) headache classification as applied to a headache clinic population, Cephalalgia, 1994;14:443–6.
  76. Manzoni GC, Granella F, Sandrini G, et al., Classification of chronic daily headache by International Headache Society criteria: limits and new proposals, Cephalalgia, 1995;15:37–43.
  77. Olesen J, Rasmussen BK, The International Headache Society classification of chornic daily and near-daily headaches: a critique of the criticism, Cephalalgia, 1996;16:407–11.
  78. Bigal ME, Sheftell FD, Rapoport AM, et al., Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population: correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache, Cephalalgia, 2002;22:432–8.
  79. Silberstein SD, Olesen J, Bousser MG, et al.; on behalf of the International Headache Society, Brief report: the international classification of headache disorders, 2nd edition (ICHD-II)- revision of criteria for 8.2 Medication-overuse headache, Cephalalgia, 2005;25:460–65.
  80. Headache Classification Committee: Olesen J, Bousser MG, Diener HC, et al., New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine, Cephalalgia, 2006;26:742–6.
  81. Silberstein SD, Chronic migraine: diagnosis and management strategy, Rev Neurol Dis, 2004;1:155–60.
  82. Sun-Edelstein C, Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache: clarifying the current international headache society criteria for classification, Cephalalgia, 2008 (in press).

Copyright® 2012 Touch Group PLC. All rights reserved.
Touch Neurology is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatment recommendations.