Comprehensive Care in Multiple Sclerosis – A Patient-centred Approach

Comprehensive Care in Multiple Sclerosis – A Patient-centred Approach

Published: European Neurology - Volume 3 Issue 2
dots

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex neurological disease with a farreaching impact on patients and families throughout a lifetime with the disease. Its hallmark is uncertainty; it has physical, emotional, financial and psychosocial implications throughout its course. Care in MS has evolved from a wait-and-see attitude during the mid-1900s to a more proactive stance with the advent of effective disease-modifying and symptomatic therapies. Therefore, interactions with the healthcare community have become more intense and increasingly frequent for patients and their providers. Today, patients are impelled to make emotionally charged decisions regarding their healthcare virtually from the time of their diagnosis and with each change in their condition.

The inflammatory pathology of MS includes damage to the myelin and axon in the white matter of the brain and spinal cord.1 Recently, there have been reports of grey matter involvement resulting from different pathological mechanisms that have been shown to contribute to longterm disability in MS.2 There are implications of MS that involve not only the symptoms but also the adjustment of living with a chronic illness that may bring disability, lifestyle changes and significant alterations in quality of life. With the advent of disease-modifying therapy, patients with relapsing forms of MS must follow treatment regimens, monitor their condition, adapt to changes and regularly make decisions about whether they need to seek care or are able to handle their problem on their own. Functioning as a self-care manager requires a high level of knowledge, skill and confidence.

The History of Disease Modification in Multiple Sclerosis
In the 20th century, treatment focused on symptomatic care, as well as relapse management. The use of corticosteroids was the hallmark of relapse management, although there was no evidence that this therapy brought any long-term permanent benefit. During the 1980s, researchers began studying interferons as a possible treatment for people with MS because it was believed that intercurrent viral infections may trigger MS attacks and beta-interferons might have an immunomodulating effect on this process.3 During the same period there were investigations into the use of a synthetic polypeptide, co-polymer I, to modify MS relapses. As a result of four pivotal trials that demonstrated effective outcomes in relapsing forms of MS, Betaseron was approved for use in the US in 1993; Avonex and Copaxone entered the marketplace for relapsing–remitting MS in 1996; and Rebif, although approved in many countries throughout the world, finally entered the US market in 2002.

References:
  1. Vollmer T, Multiple sclerosis: the disease and its diagnosis, In vanden Noort and Holland, Multiple Sclerosis in Clinical Practice, New York: Demos, 1999.
  2. Fisniku LK, Chard DT, Jackson JS, et al., Gray matter atrophy is related to long-term disability in multiple sclerosis, Ann Neurol, 2008;643:247–54.
  3. Ross AP, The evolution of disease management. In Halper J, Advanced Concepts in Multiple Sclerosis Nursing, 2nd Edition, New York: Demos Medical Publishing, 2007:53–68.
  4. Cobble ND, Burks JS, The team approach to the management of multiple sclerosis. In Maloney F, Burks JS, Ringel SR (eds), Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromuscular Disorders, Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co,1985:11–31.
  5. Ross AP, The evolution of disease management, In Halper J (ed.), Advanced Concepts of Multiple Sclerosis Nursing, New York: Demos Medical Publishing, 2007:62–3.
  6. Multiple Sclerosis Nurse Specialist Consensus Committee, Multiple sclerosis: key issues in nursing management, Adherence, Cognitive Function, Quality of Life, New York: Bioscience, 2004.
  7. Carra A, Onaha P, Luetig G, et al., Therapeutic outcome 3 years after switching of immunolomodulatory therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting MS in Argentina, Eur J Neurol, 2008;15:386–93.
  8. MS Trust, Disease Modifying Therapy. What you need to know, Letchworth Garden City, UK.
  9. Freedman MS, Patry DG, Grand’Maison F, et al., Treatment optimization in multiple sclerosis, Can J Neurol Sci, 2004;312:157–68.
  10. O’Rourke KET, Hutchinson M, Stopping beta-interferon therapy in multiple sclerosis: an analysis of stopping patterns, Mult Scler, 2005;11:46–50.
  11. Weinstock-Guttman B, Ramanathan M, Switching therapy in multiple sclerosis: challenge and potential, Medscape Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2007.
  12. Lage MJ, Castelli-Haley J, Oleen-Burkey MA, Effect of immunomodulatory therapy and other factors on employment loss time in multiple sclerosis, Work, 2006;27:143–51.
  13. Bishop B, Easterling CB, Greinel E, et al., Counseling Points: Quality of Life Issues in MS, Ridgewood, NJ: Delaware Media Group, 2007;2:4.
  14. Morgante L, Integrating the concept of hope into clinical practice, In Halper J, Holland N, Editors, Comprehensive Nursing Care in Multiple Sclerosis, 2nd Edition, New Yoark: Demos, 2002.

Copyright® 2012 Touch Group PLC. All rights reserved.
Touch Neurology is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatment recommendations.